Skip to main content

The theories of everything, from an astronomer’s perspective

Enormous projects in astronomy are creating enormous data sets and creating enormous data analysis challenges; indeed there are several areas of astrophysics in which we can think about truly comprehensive data sets that could, for example, measure the amplitude of every large-scale structure mode (above some scale) in the visible Universe, or the position and velocity of every star (above some luminosity) in the Milky Way.  These enormous data sets bring enormous data-analysis challenges.  I argue that causal, generative, probabilistic models provide the most precise and accurate methods for moving information from the observations to the physical quantities of interest.  I also argue that all models are a mixture of rigid, physics-based, low-parameter models and flexible, data-driven, highly or infinitely parameterized models.  Eventually, these probabilistic models will (or ought to) merge into an enormous “theory of everything” with astounding numbers of nuisance parameters.  I discuss our path to this singularity with examples of non-trivial data analyses in areas of the Solar System, exoplanets, and cosmology.

Cody Hall

David Hogg (NYU)

March 14, 2014
14:00 - 15:00