Summary
The Survey
Understanding dark energy, the most dominant and least understood
component of the universe, is the single greatest goal in cosmology
(and arguably, all of physics) for the next decade. Measuring the
dark energy equation of state, encapsulated by the w
parameter, and its evolution is the goal of a number of on-going
and planned experiments. Recent modeling highlights the fact that
measuring the abundance of massive galaxy clusters is an essential
complementry component of this effort. We are thus carrying out a
1000 sq. deg cluster survey using MegaCam, applying the
demonstrably very successful techniques developed for the
now-completed Red Sequence Cluster Survey, with the goal of
determining w to a precision of 10% (from clusters alone).
This survey will provide constraints in the w--ΩM
plane which are orthogonal and of similar uncertainty to
SNe constraints (e.g., from the CFHT-LS). We have also started a
parallel effort to link optical richness (measurable from the
survey data) to cluster mass, including dynamics, X-ray, weak
lensing, and NIR studies. Weak lensing analysis using both the
survey and followup data will be used as our primary mass-richness
calibrator. Our second major science goal is the discovery of
50-100 new strong lensing clusters -- a powerful and important new
tool for studying the early stages of galaxy formation at high
redshifts.
Background
The observational evidence for dark energy as a dominant
component of the universe has been steadily increasing in the past
few years, most notably thanks to improved measurements of the
cosmic microwave background and high-redshift SNe (e.g.,
[14],[20a]). Arguably, the single greatest task facing cosmology in
this decade is to improve our understanding of the dark energy by
placing constraints on the way it evolves with time. A first step
in this direction is the measurement of the equation of state of the
dark energy w = P/ρ. Most current efforts, instigated by the type Ia
SNe results (e.g., [20]), aim to constrain w by measuring the
distance-redshift relation (e.g., the SuperNova Cosmology Project[25],
the CFHTLS[26], or proposed surveys to measure baryon oscillations in
the galaxy power spectrum [2]). An alternative route is to measure the
growth of structure as a function of redshift. It is a fundamentally
different approach, which, in conjunction with "distance" methods, can
provide a unique test of general relativity on large scales as
well. For instance, cosmic shear studies (e.g., the CFHTLS) aim to
constrain w this way. Given the importance of a successful
determination of w, several independent methods should be used. Of
these, the measurement of the abundance of clusters of galaxies as a
function of mass and redshift has attracted much attention (e.g., see
review in [17]). The cluster mass function is an excellent probe due to
its combined sensitivity to the comoving volume, as well as the growth
of large scale structure. The rare, very massive clusters at redshifts
z>0.5 provide most of the discriminating power, requiring surveys that
are an order of magnitude larger than those existing to date. Many
large experiments are being planned, of which the South Pole Telescope
Sunyaev-Zeldovich survey (see [17]) is the most relevant. Once
operational (earliest, 2007), it aims to cover 4000 deg2. However,
this type of observations provides only limited information about the
clusters and cluster redshifts need to be obtained independently. To
this end, a US team is building a custom wide-field camera to image the
surveyed area in the optical (the Dark Energy Survey [28]), which would
start observations late-2009 at the earliest. A much quicker and
cost-efficient survey of similar coverage is to use optical multi-color
imaging alone and the very successful cluster red-sequence technique
for cluster finding (Fig. 1 and 2; see [8] for the first cluster
catalogs, and [8a] for the first cosmological results from the RCS1).
Additional Major Science Goals
The 90 deg2 of the RCS1 contains a half dozen strong lensing
clusters[7] at z>0.5, including several examples with multiple bright
arcs. A 1000 deg2 survey of similar depth should discover 50-100 such
systems (Fig. 4; 15 have been discovered in the first 120 deg2), by
far the largest homogeneous sample of strong lensing clusters. These
data will enable us to study star formation and stellar populations of
young, forming galaxies in great detail thanks to the large
magnifications [e.g., 6,7,24]. Finally, the data provide an ideal data
set to study cosmic shear and the properties of dark matter halos from
weak lensing (e.g., [12,13]) over a significantly larger area than
other on-going surveys.
References
- [1] Balbi, A., et al. 2000, ApJ, 545, L1
- [2] Blake, C. & Glazebrooke, K. 2003, ApJ,594, 655
- [3] Blindert, K., Yee,
H.K.C., Ellingson, E., & Gladders M.D. 2004, in IAU col. 194,
astroph/0404314
- [4] de Bernardis, P., et al. 2000, Nature, 404, 955
- [5] Gladders, M.D. & Yee, H.K.C. 2000, AJ, 120, 2148
- [6] Gladders, M.D.,
Yee, H.K.C. & Ellingson, E. 2002, AJ, 123, 1
- [7] Gladders, M.D.,
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H.K.C., Hall, P., & Barrientos, F. 2003, ApJ, 593,
48
- [8] Gladders, M. & Yee, H. 2005, ApJS, 157, 1
- [8a] Gladders, M., Yee,
H., Majumdar, S., Hoekstra, H., Barrientos, F. 2005, preprint to be
submitted to ApJL (preprint)
- [9] Gladders,
M.D. & Yee, H.K.C. 2005, preprint to be submitted to AJ
- 10] Haiman, Z.,
Mohr, J.J., & Holder, G.P. 2001, ApJ, 553, 545
- [11] Hicks, A.,
Ellingson, E., Bautz, M., Yee, H.K.C., Gladders, M. & Garmire,G 2004,
astro-ph/0410167
- [12] Hoekstra H., Yee, H.K.C., & Gladders M. 2000, ApJ,
577, 659
- [13] Hoekstra H., Yee, H.K.C., & Gladders M. 2004, ApJ, 585,
215
- [14] Jaffe, A., et al. 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 3475
- [15] Levine,
E.S., Schulz, A.E. & White, M. 2002,
- [16] Majumdar, S. & Mohr,
J.J. 2004, ApJ, 613, 41
- [17] Mohr J.J. 2004, in NOAO "Observing Dark
Energy Meeting", astro-ph/0408481
- [18] Perlmutter, S., et al. 1999, ApJ,
517, 565
- [19] Pettini et al. 2000, ApJ, 528, 96
- [20] Riess, A.G.,
Filippenko, A.V., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1009 [20a] Riess, A.G. et
al. 2004, ApJ, 607, 665
- [21] Rosati, P., et al. 1998, ApJ, 492, 21
- [22] Weller, J., Battye, R., & Kneissl, R., 2002, Phys.Rev.Lett., 88,
231301
- [23] Yee, H.K.C., & Ellingson, E. 2003, ApJ, 585, 215
- [24] Yee,
H.K.C., Ellingson, E., Bechtold, J., Carlberg, R., & Cuillandre,
J.-C. 1996, AJ, 111, 1783 [25] Yee, H.K.C., 1991, PASP, 103, 396
- [26] http://www-supernova.lbl.gov/
- [27] http://www.cfht.hawaii.edu/Science/CFHLS/
- [28] http://cosmology.astro.uiuc.edu.edu/DES
Back to index
|