Claudius Ptolemy
Geographer and Astronomer: Entrenching
The Geocentric Concept
Katherine McCracken
SCI199Y1
Claudius Ptolemy
is unquestionably the last of the great scientists of ancient
As noted earlier, The Almagest is a collection of thirteen books, each dealing with a variety of astronomical concepts, like the motions of the Earth, Moon, planets and stars. In addition, it explains mathematical problems, some of which were referenced from other mathematicians and others which were created by Ptolemy himself. It describes some of the physical geography observed at this time. Ptolemy’s mathematical knowledge was only possible with his complete understanding and access to the data collected by earlier scientists. Even without a list of reputable teachers, the Alexandrian library could have provided an affluent source of information for him. Even with all of his “borrowings” from other workers, Ptolemy was the first to develop a mathematical theory to explain the motions of the planets. After all, he was a mathematician above all else. With the help of Hipparchus’s observations and notes, Ptolemy formulated and improved the geocentric concept, or the Ptolemaic system, as it is also known. This theory is explained and described in the first two books of The Almagest. Ptolemy gives, with great detail, a mathematical theory of the Sun, Moon, and planetary movements. At this time, there were only five planets known in existence; Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. The Ptolemaic model was also designed to explain how the “heavens” moved. “Planets became associated traditionally with colour, metals, minerals, and parts of the human body.”[8] Ptolemy argued that the planets and other celestial objects had a certain “power” over earthly events and happenings. This system eventually became a basic pattern for astrology. According to this system, planet Earth was by far the largest of the planets, and it was located right in the centre of the universe. In this geocentric model, the Earth was successively being orbited by the Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, as well as the “crystalline heavens” and stars.[9] The orbits of these celestial bodies were thought to be geocentric, measured with respect to the centre of the earth, and not concentric, having a common centre that is not the earth, as which was previously believed. Ptolemy had noticed that there was an “inequality” to the movements of the planets; there had to be something causing these unusual motions.
A Greek astronomer by the name of Apollonius of Perga, also known as ‘The Great Geometer’, was the first to devise a system to explain the uniform, circular movements of the planets. He was presumably the founder of Greek mathematical astronomy, and he used geometrical models (i.e. using geometry) to explain planetary theory. In Ptolemy’s book called Syntaxis (also known as The Almagest), he stated, “Apollonius introduced systems of eccentric and epicyclic motion to explain the apparent motion of the planets across the sky.”[10] It is believed that the theory of epicycles was not created by Apollonius; it was only improved by him. What we do know is that he was very interested in determining the points where the forward motion of planets appears to change to retrograde motion and vice versa. His ability to have mastered geometry certainly would have helped him in this study. In order to prove his theory of geocentricity, Ptolemy had to introduce, and attempt to explain, a number of different concepts. First of all, to begin to explain the geocentric concept, one must envision the Earth, eccentrically placed, and immobile at the centre of the universe. Revolving around this stationary earth, in order, were the Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Ptolemy had realized, along with Hipparchus, that there were inequalities in their motions and the only way to explain them was by applying a system of epicycles and deferent’s or one with eccentrics; both theories were suggested by Apollonius. At this time in the world’s history, people believed that Earth was no longer flat, but it was spherical. To accommodate what we now know as a heliocentric revolution, (where the planets revolve around the sun, not the earth); Ptolemy placed a series of epicycles on the general revolution path of each planet. Because the planets appeared to “wander” across a fixed field of stars, occasionally reversing direction; (what we now call retrograde motion), Aristotle suggested that the planets were attached to epicycles, which were attached to deferents. Therefore, the concurrent revolution of both the epicycles and deferents created the intermittent “reversal” of the movements of the planets around the earth. To further understand this concept it is important to know what epicycles and deferents are. “The planets were attached, not to the concentric spheres themselves, but to circles attached to the concentric spheres… these circles were called epicycles, and the concentric spheres to which they were attached were termed the deferents.”[11] In other words, a planet was placed on a circular path, an ‘epicycle’, and this epicycle revolved around a larger circular path, the ‘deferent’, which ultimately circled the Earth. Ptolemy, after careful analysis and consideration, added something more to Aristotle’s theory. First of all, he displaced the Earth from the centre of the universe, claiming that the planets actually revolved around an eccentric, a point which was near the earth, but not exactly on it. To prove this theory he suggested that the epicycles should be placed on other epicycles. “The motion was comparable to that of an eccentric valve gear on a steam locomotive.”[12] Even with all of these theories, there were still certain occurrences that could not be explained, such as the unusual and unaccounted for movements of the planets. Because of this, Ptolemy introduced another part to this geocentric concept. He suggested that there was an imaginary point “placed on the diameter of the deferent but at a position opposite to that of the Earth from the centre of the deferent.”[13] He called this point the equant. With the equant in place, the system now worked like this: the Earth was now located a short distance from the centre of each of the deferents, and the centre of each deferent and epicycle caused the circular motion of the planets around the equant. He also proposed that the distance from the earth to the centre of the deferent was equal to that of the distance between the centres of the deferent to the equant. With this new aspect to his theory, Ptolemy was able to explain the unaccounted for movements of the celestial bodies. However, there is still one more part to this Ptolemaic system. The sun’s annual path across the stars was given a name; it was called the plane of the ecliptic. Ptolemy stated that “the planes of the deferents” were inclined at small angles to this plane of the ecliptic, and the planes of the deferents epicycles were inclined by equal amounts to the deferents. Therefore the planes of the epicycles were parallel to that of the ecliptic. The idea of a geocentric universe was the leading theory for over a millennium. It was not until the year 1543 when Nicholas Copernicus published the book De Revolutionibus Orbium Caelestium did the end of the geocentric era arise.
After the publication of Copernicus’s treatise in 1543 the geocentric model of the universe was questioned thoroughly by astronomers and scientists alike. According to this new heliocentric model of the universe, the earth and the other planets revolved around the Sun, and not the Earth. In the beginning, this theory was not wholeheartedly believed because it lacked concrete experimental and observational results. In the Copernican theory the Earth was given the rank of a planet, and it did a full rotation on its axis once every twenty four hours. Copernicus replaced Ptolemy’s equant’s with the possibility of uniform motion. The planets were believed to move in ellipses with sun in the centre; i.e. the principle concept of uniform circular motion. This proved that the geocentric concept was wrong. Therefore, the orbits of the planets were no longer believed to be circular, they were oval; elliptical. This elliptical theory was first discovered by Johannes Kepler. This theory was hard to believe for some, because Ptolemy’s theory of a geocentric universe made a lot of sense, and seemed favourable to them for several reasons. One of which being the Earth was the largest celestial body in the sky, and it was located in the centre of the universe; a sign that God obviously purposely designed it that way. The sun and planets also revolved around it, showing the earth is central and the most important thing in the sky. That ideology however, was proved wrong. The geocentric concept that held the top rank for 1400 years was no longer believed. The most important concept Copernicus introduced was the possibility that man was no longer the most superior being in the universe; an idea Ptolemy’s geocentric model favoured greatly.
Claudius
Ptolemy, a mathematician, geographer, and astronomer from
Works Cited
[1] The Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 3, ed. Paul Murdin, IOP Publishing Ltd
and Nature Publishing Group, London, UK, 2001
[2] Connor, J.J.,
Robertson, E.F., Claudius Ptolemy,
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Printonly/Ptolemy.html, April 1999
[3] Connor, J.J.,
Robertson, E.F., Theon of Smyrna, http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Theon_of_Smyrna.html,
April 1999
[4] Encyclopedia of Planetary Sciences, ed. Shirley, H. James, Fairbridge,
[5] Encyclopedia of Planetary Sciences, ed. Shirley, H. James, Fairbridge,
[6] Connor, J.J.,
Robertson, E.F., Claudius Ptolemy,
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Printonly/Ptolemy.html, April 1999
[7] Connor, J.J.,
Robertson, E.F., Claudius Ptolemy,
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Printonly/Ptolemy.html, April 1999
[8] Encyclopedia of Planetary Sciences, ed. Shirley, H. James, Fairbridge,
[9] Encyclopedia of Planetary Sciences, ed. Shirley, H. James, Fairbridge,
[10] Connor, J.J.,
Robertson, E.F., Apollonius of Perga,
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Apollonius.html 99,
April 19
[11] The Solar System, http://www.phys.unt.edu/Astronomy/online_course_files/sample_pages/04_1.html
[12] Encyclopedia of Planetary Sciences, ed. Shirley, H. James, Fairbridge,
[13] Claudius Ptolemaeus -
'Ptolemy' : 90-168 AD, http://www.acmi.net.au/AIC/PTOLEMY_BIO.html
[14] Arnett, B.,
http://obs.nineplanets.org/psc/theman.html, June 7th, 2000
[15] The Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 3, ed. Paul Murdin, IOP Publishing Ltd
and Nature Publishing Group, London, UK, 2001